scholar-feed-mcp — alternative #1 to fittin-mcp
📇 ☁️ - Semantic search over 600k+ CS/AI papers with citation-graph traversal, full-text extraction, embeddings, and BibTeX export. Works ano...
Search tools, jump to categories, and open key destinations
Recorded alternatives
Every candidate below sits in AI. What ends up on this page is decided entirely by a recorded score — not by bidding, not by editor taste. Review both records, check current vendor terms, then decide.
📇 ☁️ - Semantic search over 600k+ CS/AI papers with citation-graph traversal, full-text extraction, embeddings, and BibTeX export. Works ano...
📇 ☁️ 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Analyze how AI models (Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek) see your brand. Returns AI Visibility Score, per-mod...
📇 ☁️ - Transcriptor MCP is your choice when you need transcripts and metadata for AI, summarization, or content analysis
Each candidate is a live catalogue record in the same primary category, picked by a deterministic score that Oryxen records in its catalogue: how many meaningful words the two listings share, whether their pricing classes oppose (a paid product against a free one), whether both are open source, and whether either record is featured. The same catalogue state always produces the same list — no randomness, no manual ranking.
No. Rows are ordered only by the recorded score, highest first, with alphabetical ties — payment never influences the order, nothing here is paid placement, and Oryxen charges no listing or placement fee.
Always verify current terms with fittin-mcp directly — Oryxen records pricing classes, not live quotes.