cursor-usage — alternative #1 to mcp-server
📇 🏠 - Enterprise AI coding usage analytics — track spend, model usage, and costs across Cursor/Claude Code sessions via MCP server
Search tools, jump to categories, and open key destinations
Recorded alternatives
Every candidate below sits in AI. What ends up on this page is decided entirely by a recorded score — not by bidding, not by editor taste. Review both records, check current vendor terms, then decide.
📇 🏠 - Enterprise AI coding usage analytics — track spend, model usage, and costs across Cursor/Claude Code sessions via MCP server
📇 ☁️ 🏠 - Query your Spanlens LLM observability from any MCP client. 7 read tools for request logs, agent traces, cost stats, anomalies, mode...
📇 ☁️ 🍎 🪟 🐧 - AI API cost tracking and budget enforcement across 11 LLM providers. 6 tools for spend analytics, budget monitoring, session su...
🐍 ☁️ 🍎 🪟 🐧 - MCP server for quelllm.fr — open-weights LLM catalog (250+ models with params, VRAM by quantization, tokens/sec, license). Tool...
Each candidate is a live catalogue record in the same primary category, picked by a deterministic score that Oryxen records in its catalogue: how many meaningful words the two listings share, whether their pricing classes oppose (a paid product against a free one), whether both are open source, and whether either record is featured. The same catalogue state always produces the same list — no randomness, no manual ranking.
No. Rows are ordered only by the recorded score, highest first, with alphabetical ties — payment never influences the order, nothing here is paid placement, and Oryxen charges no listing or placement fee.
Always verify current terms with mcp-server directly — Oryxen records pricing classes, not live quotes.