#1 AI CodingUnknown
statelessagent — alternative #1 to m1nd
🏎️ 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Memory with provenance tracking — records where agent knowledge originated and detects when sources change. 17 MCP tools for se...
GitHub source
Recorded alternatives
Alternatives to m1nd
Every candidate below sits in AI Coding. What ends up on this page is decided entirely by a recorded score — not by bidding, not by editor taste. Review both records, check current vendor terms, then decide.
#2 AI CodingUnknown
linksee-memory — alternative #2 to m1nd
📇 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Local-first cross-agent memory with a 6-layer structure, Ebbinghaus-style forgetting curve, and drift detection that catches whe...
GitHub source
#3 AI CodingUnknown
oz-mcp-server — alternative #3 to m1nd
📇 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Bridges Warp's Oz coding agent to any IDE or MCP client (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex), plus native @oz in VS Code Copilot Chat. I...
GitHub source3MIT
#4 AI CodingUnknown
Project Tiny Context Harness — alternative #4 to m1nd
⭐ 3 — Minimal repo-native project memory for CLI coding agents. Installs AGENTS.md, project_context/**, role Skills, and a validate-context...
GitHub source
#5 AI CodingUnknown
agy-bridge — alternative #5 to m1nd
📇 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Delegate heavy tasks from Claude Code (or any MCP client) to the Antigravity CLI (Gemini): file analysis, repo archaeology, web...
GitHub source
#6 AI CodingUnknown
lean-memory — alternative #6 to m1nd
🐍 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Embedded, local-first agent memory in a single SQLite file per namespace (vec0 + FTS5 hybrid retrieval). ADD-only history querya...
GitHub source
#7 AI CodingUnknown
postmortemthis — alternative #7 to m1nd
⭐ 1 — Runs every coding-agent CLI you have (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Qwen, Vibe) in parallel and read-only over your diff, then synthesiz...
GitHub source
#8 AI CodingUnknown
Ralph Workflow — alternative #8 to m1nd
⭐ 5 — Local-first loop runner for Claude Code/Codex CLI: executes a spec in a real git repo with progress.json + resume.md + a 3-step timeou...
GitHub source
Questions about this page
How were these alternatives selected?
Each candidate is a live catalogue record in the same primary category, picked by a deterministic score that Oryxen records in its catalogue: how many meaningful words the two listings share, whether their pricing classes oppose (a paid product against a free one), whether both are open source, and whether either record is featured. The same catalogue state always produces the same list — no randomness, no manual ranking.
Are these alternatives ranked by payment?
No. Rows are ordered only by the recorded score, highest first, with alphabetical ties — payment never influences the order, nothing here is paid placement, and Oryxen charges no listing or placement fee.
Always verify current terms with m1nd directly — Oryxen records pricing classes, not live quotes.