gate402-mcp — alternative #1 to Hlido
📇 ☁️ - Pay-per-call agent APIs over x402 (USDC on Base): per-token LLM inference (Llama 3.1/Qwen/Mistral), per-second GPU/CPU compute, on-ch...
Search tools, jump to categories, and open key destinations
Recorded alternatives
Every candidate below sits in AI. What ends up on this page is decided entirely by a recorded score — not by bidding, not by editor taste. Review both records, check current vendor terms, then decide.
📇 ☁️ - Pay-per-call agent APIs over x402 (USDC on Base): per-token LLM inference (Llama 3.1/Qwen/Mistral), per-second GPU/CPU compute, on-ch...
📇 ☁️ - Scores a company against a weighted ideal customer profile, returning a 0-100 score, A/B/C tier, and per-signal breakdown.
📇 ☁️ 🍎 🪟 🐧 - AI agent identity, trust, and audit trail infrastructure. 17 MCP tools: register agents with Ed25519 keypairs, check permission...
🐍 🏠 - Auditable strategic-risk memos for AI agents — sanctions, regulatory, geopolitics, trade. Geography-routed regional specialists (Centr...
🐍 🏠 - Local-first production-readiness audit for AI-built apps: read-only checks, an evidence-based 0-100 score, and guided fixes before lau...
Each candidate is a live catalogue record in the same primary category, picked by a deterministic score that Oryxen records in its catalogue: how many meaningful words the two listings share, whether their pricing classes oppose (a paid product against a free one), whether both are open source, and whether either record is featured. The same catalogue state always produces the same list — no randomness, no manual ranking.
No. Rows are ordered only by the recorded score, highest first, with alphabetical ties — payment never influences the order, nothing here is paid placement, and Oryxen charges no listing or placement fee.
Always verify current terms with Hlido directly — Oryxen records pricing classes, not live quotes.