Search Oryxen

Search tools, jump to categories, and open key destinations

Recorded alternatives

Alternatives to gptme

Every candidate below sits in AI. What ends up on this page is decided entirely by a recorded score — not by bidding, not by editor taste. Review both records, check current vendor terms, then decide.

#1 AIUnknown

gptme-agent-template — alternative #1 to gptme

gptme** ⭐ 4.4k — AI agent in your terminal with support for persistent autonomous agents. Runs code, edits files, browses the web. Build lon...

GitHub source
#2 AIFree

Prime Agent — alternative #2 to gptme

⭐ 16.7k [Prime Intellect] — Self-improving RLM coding agent where a persistent IPython kernel is the model's only tool, so file edits, shell...

GitHub source
#3 AIFree

Hermes Agent (NousResearch — alternative #3 to gptme

⭐ 232k — Nous Research's self-improving CLI agent with persistent memory, automated skill creation, sandboxed code execution via Unix socket...

GitHub source
#4 AIFree

Wiggum CLI — alternative #4 to gptme

Open-source agent that scans codebases, generates specs through AI interviews, and runs autonomous coding loops via Claude Code or Codex. Ag...

Catalogue source
#5 AIUnknown

Warp — alternative #5 to gptme

⭐ 64.3k [Warp] — Modern terminal with built-in AI agent mode; understands tasks, runs commands, edits files, and orchestrates multi-step wor...

GitHub source
#6 AIFree

Hermes Agent — alternative #6 to gptme

A self-improving personal agent with memory, messaging integrations, and sandboxed tool execution. #opensource

Catalogue source
#7 AIUnknown

Odysseys leaderboard — alternative #7 to gptme

Browser Use is also **#1 on the ** with an 87.4% average, ahead of computer-use agents from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Microsoft. Odysse...

Catalogue source
#8 AIFree

MemPalace — alternative #8 to gptme

High-performance, benchmarked AI memory system for persistent recall and retrieval in long-horizon autonomous workflows.

GitHub source

Questions about this page

How were these alternatives selected?

Each candidate is a live catalogue record in the same primary category, picked by a deterministic score that Oryxen records in its catalogue: how many meaningful words the two listings share, whether their pricing classes oppose (a paid product against a free one), whether both are open source, and whether either record is featured. The same catalogue state always produces the same list — no randomness, no manual ranking.

Are these alternatives ranked by payment?

No. Rows are ordered only by the recorded score, highest first, with alphabetical ties — payment never influences the order, nothing here is paid placement, and Oryxen charges no listing or placement fee.

Always verify current terms with gptme directly — Oryxen records pricing classes, not live quotes.