agent-search-mcp — alternative #1 to agent-memory
📇 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Free multi-engine MCP search server — 8 free engines (DDG, Sogou, Bing, Baidu, Wikipedia, Startpage, Yandex, Mojeek), waterfall...
Search tools, jump to categories, and open key destinations
Recorded alternatives
Every candidate below sits in AI Coding. What ends up on this page is decided entirely by a recorded score — not by bidding, not by editor taste. Review both records, check current vendor terms, then decide.
📇 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Free multi-engine MCP search server — 8 free engines (DDG, Sogou, Bing, Baidu, Wikipedia, Startpage, Yandex, Mojeek), waterfall...
📇 🏠 ☁️ 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Personal knowledge graph for Claude on Neo4j. Typed entities (Person/Project/Decision/Preference/Concept), bi-temporal edge v...
📇 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Local-first cross-agent memory with a 6-layer structure, Ebbinghaus-style forgetting curve, and drift detection that catches whe...
📇 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Zero-config session continuity for Claude Code, OpenAI Codex CLI & Google Gemini CLI, sharing one local db. Auto context injecti...
🏎️ 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Memory with provenance tracking — records where agent knowledge originated and detects when sources change. 17 MCP tools for se...
Each candidate is a live catalogue record in the same primary category, picked by a deterministic score that Oryxen records in its catalogue: how many meaningful words the two listings share, whether their pricing classes oppose (a paid product against a free one), whether both are open source, and whether either record is featured. The same catalogue state always produces the same list — no randomness, no manual ranking.
No. Rows are ordered only by the recorded score, highest first, with alphabetical ties — payment never influences the order, nothing here is paid placement, and Oryxen charges no listing or placement fee.
Always verify current terms with agent-memory directly — Oryxen records pricing classes, not live quotes.