cursor-usage — alternative #1 to Corgea
📇 🏠 - Enterprise AI coding usage analytics — track spend, model usage, and costs across Cursor/Claude Code sessions via MCP server
Search tools, jump to categories, and open key destinations
Recorded alternatives
Every candidate below sits in AI. What ends up on this page is decided entirely by a recorded score — not by bidding, not by editor taste. Review both records, check current vendor terms, then decide.
📇 🏠 - Enterprise AI coding usage analytics — track spend, model usage, and costs across Cursor/Claude Code sessions via MCP server
🎖️ 📇 ☁️ - Discover, invoke, and cryptographically verify AI agents on a paid agent marketplace. 13 tools spanning code generation (6-module...
🐍 🏠 ☁️ 🍎 🪟 🐧 - TCG collectibles + AI agent intelligence. 35+ tools: Vision AI card grading (PSA/Beckett prediction), Monte Carlo price simul...
tunedforai/x402-mcp 📇 ☁️ - Real-time crypto market structure for AI agents — orderflow across 20 exchanges, 24 tokens. 9 tools: price/fundin...
Integrated AI across GitLab for code suggestions, security scanning, and workflows.
Each candidate is a live catalogue record in the same primary category, picked by a deterministic score that Oryxen records in its catalogue: how many meaningful words the two listings share, whether their pricing classes oppose (a paid product against a free one), whether both are open source, and whether either record is featured. The same catalogue state always produces the same list — no randomness, no manual ranking.
No. Rows are ordered only by the recorded score, highest first, with alphabetical ties — payment never influences the order, nothing here is paid placement, and Oryxen charges no listing or placement fee.
Always verify current terms with Corgea directly — Oryxen records pricing classes, not live quotes.