passbaton — alternative #1 to CodeGraph
📇 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Zero-config session continuity for Claude Code, OpenAI Codex CLI & Google Gemini CLI, sharing one local db. Auto context injecti...
Search tools, jump to categories, and open key destinations
Recorded alternatives
Every candidate below sits in AI Coding. What ends up on this page is decided entirely by a recorded score — not by bidding, not by editor taste. Review both records, check current vendor terms, then decide.
📇 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Zero-config session continuity for Claude Code, OpenAI Codex CLI & Google Gemini CLI, sharing one local db. Auto context injecti...
🏎️ 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Memory with provenance tracking — records where agent knowledge originated and detects when sources change. 17 MCP tools for se...
⭐ 22 — Local-first MCP server that gives a CLI coding agent a neuro-symbolic code graph over the repo: impact/why/change-reasoning across a...
⭐ 7 — Rust CLI that runs interactive coding CLIs (Claude, Codex, Gemini, opencode, pi, Cursor) inside tmux and exposes a normalized claude -...
🐍 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Event-sourced agent memory on a hash-chained append-only log with an embedded temporal knowledge graph (Kuzu, no sidecar). Cited...
Each candidate is a live catalogue record in the same primary category, picked by a deterministic score that Oryxen records in its catalogue: how many meaningful words the two listings share, whether their pricing classes oppose (a paid product against a free one), whether both are open source, and whether either record is featured. The same catalogue state always produces the same list — no randomness, no manual ranking.
No. Rows are ordered only by the recorded score, highest first, with alphabetical ties — payment never influences the order, nothing here is paid placement, and Oryxen charges no listing or placement fee.
Always verify current terms with CodeGraph directly — Oryxen records pricing classes, not live quotes.