#1 AI CodingUnknown
ctxfile — alternative #1 to Burnd
📇 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Local-first MCP server that snapshots your project's working state — files, git, plan, and decisions — into one structured conte...
GitHub source
Recorded alternatives
Alternatives to Burnd
Every candidate below sits in AI Coding. What ends up on this page is decided entirely by a recorded score — not by bidding, not by editor taste. Review both records, check current vendor terms, then decide.
#2 AI CodingUnknown
token-meter — alternative #2 to Burnd
📇 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Local-first dashboard + MCP server for Claude Code and Codex token usage. Cost, per-MCP/per-tool breakdown, hourly distribution,...
GitHub source
#3 AI CodingUnknown
claude-soul — alternative #3 to Burnd
📇 🏠 🍎 🐧 - Self-improving learning engine for Claude Code. Extracts signals from every session (corrections, successes, confusion), runs peri...
GitHub source
#4 AI CodingUnknown
cortex-plugin — alternative #4 to Burnd
🐍 🏠 🍎 🐧 - Persistent, self-evolving memory plugin for Claude Code. Background miner extracts durable lessons (decisions, conventions, bug fi...
GitHub source
#5 AI CodingUnknown
passbaton — alternative #5 to Burnd
📇 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Zero-config session continuity for Claude Code, OpenAI Codex CLI & Google Gemini CLI, sharing one local db. Auto context injecti...
GitHub source
#6 AI CodingUnknown
weighted-compact — alternative #6 to Burnd
🐍 🏠 - Inspectable memory substrate for Claude Code. Three read-only MCP tools (search_pairs, compact_session, substrate_info) over a local-f...
GitHub source
#7 AI CodingUnknown
defract — alternative #7 to Burnd
macOS GUI harness for Claude Code. Drives an opinionated lifecycle (story → design → architecture → implementation → review) with a visual d...
Catalogue source
#8 AI CodingUnknown
Blindfold — alternative #8 to Burnd
[Blindfold] - A simple CLI tool for generating .gitignore files quickly and easily.
GitHub source
Questions about this page
How were these alternatives selected?
Each candidate is a live catalogue record in the same primary category, picked by a deterministic score that Oryxen records in its catalogue: how many meaningful words the two listings share, whether their pricing classes oppose (a paid product against a free one), whether both are open source, and whether either record is featured. The same catalogue state always produces the same list — no randomness, no manual ranking.
Are these alternatives ranked by payment?
No. Rows are ordered only by the recorded score, highest first, with alphabetical ties — payment never influences the order, nothing here is paid placement, and Oryxen charges no listing or placement fee.
Always verify current terms with Burnd directly — Oryxen records pricing classes, not live quotes.