#1 AIUnknown
ai-seo-mcp — alternative #1 to mcp-seo-audit
📇 ☁️ 🏠 - AI-SEO / AEO / GEO audit MCP for any public URL. Scores schema.org coverage, robots.txt and llms.txt health, canonical and OpenGrap...
GitHub source3MIT
Recorded alternatives
Alternatives to mcp-seo-audit
Every candidate below sits in AI. What ends up on this page is decided entirely by a recorded score — not by bidding, not by editor taste. Review both records, check current vendor terms, then decide.
#2 AIUnknown
ai-readiness — alternative #2 to mcp-seo-audit
📇 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Check whether a website is visible to AI search (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews). Scores AI-crawler access, JS...
GitHub source
#3 AIUnknown
maxaeo-ai-visibility-mcp — alternative #3 to mcp-seo-audit
📇 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Local-first AI visibility, GEO/AEO, and llms.txt audit MCP server for Claude, Codex, Cursor, and other agents. Checks AI crawler...
GitHub source
#4 AIUnknown
seocrawl-mcp — alternative #4 to mcp-seo-audit
🎖️ ☁️ - SEO + GEO MCP server: live Google Search Console & GA4 data, keyword and page analysis, AI-visibility tracking across ChatGPT, Claud...
GitHub source
#5 AIUnknown
ai-visibility-mcp — alternative #5 to mcp-seo-audit
🐍 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Audit how AI sees your website. Per-bot robots.txt verdicts for 22 known AI user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Googl...
GitHub source
#6 AIUnknown
crawlora-mcp — alternative #6 to mcp-seo-audit
☁️ - Hosted MCP for structured public web data — 319 tools across search, maps, commerce, social, and finance, each returning clean JSON. Fr...
GitHub source
#7 AIFreemium
GEOScore — alternative #7 to mcp-seo-audit
AI search visibility scanner that checks how websites perform in AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini). Free scan with 11 technica...
Catalogue source
#8 AIUnknown
visibilityradar-mcp — alternative #8 to mcp-seo-audit
📇 ☁️ 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Analyze how AI models (Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek) see your brand. Returns AI Visibility Score, per-mod...
GitHub source
Questions about this page
How were these alternatives selected?
Each candidate is a live catalogue record in the same primary category, picked by a deterministic score that Oryxen records in its catalogue: how many meaningful words the two listings share, whether their pricing classes oppose (a paid product against a free one), whether both are open source, and whether either record is featured. The same catalogue state always produces the same list — no randomness, no manual ranking.
Are these alternatives ranked by payment?
No. Rows are ordered only by the recorded score, highest first, with alphabetical ties — payment never influences the order, nothing here is paid placement, and Oryxen charges no listing or placement fee.
Always verify current terms with mcp-seo-audit directly — Oryxen records pricing classes, not live quotes.