#1 AI CodingFree
Garcon — alternative #1 to amux
⭐ 57 — Self-hosted browser and mobile workspace for running and steering parallel Claude Code, Codex, Cursor Agent, OpenCode, Amp, Droid, an...
GitHub source
Recorded alternatives
Alternatives to amux
Every candidate below sits in AI Coding. What ends up on this page is decided entirely by a recorded score — not by bidding, not by editor taste. Review both records, check current vendor terms, then decide.
#2 AI CodingFree
CLITrigger — alternative #2 to amux
⭐ 12 — Self-hosted web UI for orchestrating Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLIs in parallel git worktrees. Features multi-agent discussion m...
GitHub source14MIT
#3 AI CodingUnknown
cortex-plugin — alternative #3 to amux
🐍 🏠 🍎 🐧 - Persistent, self-evolving memory plugin for Claude Code. Background miner extracts durable lessons (decisions, conventions, bug fi...
GitHub source
#4 AI CodingFree
Podiom — alternative #4 to amux
⭐ 4 — Self-hosted control plane for local Claude Code and Codex CLI agents: durable named agents whose chat sessions replay onto a fresh bac...
GitHub source
#5 AI CodingFree
Unpeel — alternative #5 to amux
Native macOS app built on the Ghostty terminal engine for running and remote-controlling multiple CLI agent sessions (Claude Code, Codex, Ge...
Catalogue source
#6 AI CodingUnknown
run-kit — alternative #6 to amux
⭐ 56 — Remote, phone-first web console for tmux: spawn and watch coding agents in parallel git worktrees, agent-agnostic and no database, wi...
GitHub source
#7 AI CodingUnknown
Camofox Browser — alternative #7 to amux
⭐ 8.6k — Stealth headless browser for coding agents; Playwright-compatible with anti-detection, human-like fingerprinting, and a REST API fo...
GitHub source11.9kMIT
#8 AI CodingFree
Tasks.md — alternative #8 to amux
A self-hosted, file based task management board that supports Markdown syntax. MIT Docker
GitHub source
Questions about this page
How were these alternatives selected?
Each candidate is a live catalogue record in the same primary category, picked by a deterministic score that Oryxen records in its catalogue: how many meaningful words the two listings share, whether their pricing classes oppose (a paid product against a free one), whether both are open source, and whether either record is featured. The same catalogue state always produces the same list — no randomness, no manual ranking.
Are these alternatives ranked by payment?
No. Rows are ordered only by the recorded score, highest first, with alphabetical ties — payment never influences the order, nothing here is paid placement, and Oryxen charges no listing or placement fee.
Always verify current terms with amux directly — Oryxen records pricing classes, not live quotes.