#1 AIFree
Citio — alternative #1 to ftp-deploy-mcp
📇 ☁️ - Self-hosted AI teammate in Slack: @mention it and Claude Code or Codex investigates CloudWatch logs, runs tests, and opens pull reque...
GitHub source
Recorded alternatives
Alternatives to ftp-deploy-mcp
Every candidate below sits in AI. What ends up on this page is decided entirely by a recorded score — not by bidding, not by editor taste. Review both records, check current vendor terms, then decide.
#2 AIUnknown
queue-inspector-mcp — alternative #2 to ftp-deploy-mcp
📇 🏠 - Inspect and operate Redis-backed job queues (Asynq and BullMQ): per-state counts, job detail with decoded payload and last error, and...
GitHub source
#3 AIUnknown
glm-mcp — alternative #3 to ftp-deploy-mcp
📇 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Run GLM (Zhipu/Z.ai) as a real sub-agent inside Claude Code or GitHub Copilot. GLM gets its own agent loop (read/write/edit/run)...
GitHub source
#4 AIUnknown
hubd — alternative #4 to ftp-deploy-mcp
📇 🏠 - Files-first project hub for teams of humans and AI agents: shared journal, cross-project tasks, agent queues, and a read-only kanban....
GitHub source1MIT
#5 AIUnknown
mcp-ragchat — alternative #5 to ftp-deploy-mcp
📇 🏠 - Add RAG-powered AI chat to any website with one command. Local vector store, multi-provider LLM (OpenAI/Anthropic/Gemini), self-contai...
GitHub source
#6 AIUnknown
Omnicord — alternative #6 to ftp-deploy-mcp
📇 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Hands your AI an entire Discord server: 148 tools covering chat, moderation, automod, events, and full administration, up to bui...
GitHub source
#7 AIUnknown
specshield-mcp-server — alternative #7 to ftp-deploy-mcp
📇 ☁️ - The API-change deploy gate for AI coding agents: "is it safe to ship this API change to my consumers?" Analyze-only OpenAPI breaking-...
GitHub source
#8 AIUnknown
mcp — alternative #8 to ftp-deploy-mcp
📇 ☁️ - Deploy and manage static sites from AI agents. A simpler alternative to Vercel and Netlify for static website hosting — upload files,...
GitHub source
Questions about this page
How were these alternatives selected?
Each candidate is a live catalogue record in the same primary category, picked by a deterministic score that Oryxen records in its catalogue: how many meaningful words the two listings share, whether their pricing classes oppose (a paid product against a free one), whether both are open source, and whether either record is featured. The same catalogue state always produces the same list — no randomness, no manual ranking.
Are these alternatives ranked by payment?
No. Rows are ordered only by the recorded score, highest first, with alphabetical ties — payment never influences the order, nothing here is paid placement, and Oryxen charges no listing or placement fee.
Always verify current terms with ftp-deploy-mcp directly — Oryxen records pricing classes, not live quotes.