#1 AIFree
Chrome DevTools MCP — alternative #1 to safari-mcp
Official Model Context Protocol (MCP) server from Google that enables coding agents to control and inspect a live Chrome browser for automat...
GitHub source54.1kApache-2.0
Recorded alternatives
Alternatives to safari-mcp
Every candidate below sits in AI. What ends up on this page is decided entirely by a recorded score — not by bidding, not by editor taste. Review both records, check current vendor terms, then decide.
#2 AIUnknown
mcp — alternative #2 to safari-mcp
📇 🏠 - Browser and mobile app automation using WebdriverIO, enabling AI agents to control browsers, interact with web elements, and automate...
GitHub source
#3 AIUnknown
unbrowser — alternative #3 to safari-mcp
🦀 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Lightweight browser MCP server for LLM agents. Runs JavaScript, follows links, fills forms, manages cookies, and returns low-tok...
GitHub source
#4 AIUnknown
axint — alternative #4 to safari-mcp
📇 🏠 - Apple-native execution layer for AI agents. Compiles TypeScript to validated Swift — App Intents, SwiftUI views, WidgetKit widgets, an...
GitHub source18Apache-2.0
#5 AIUnknown
Gantry (Desktop — alternative #5 to safari-mcp
Native macOS app (SwiftUI, no Electron) for managing and monitoring Docker hosts, local and over SSH: fleet dashboard, live logs and stats,...
GitHub source
#6 AIUnknown
rrweb-stack — alternative #6 to safari-mcp
📇 🏠 - Local-first MCP server (@peekdev/mcp) + Chrome extension that records your real authenticated browser session (rrweb DOM + console + n...
GitHub source
#7 AIUnknown
APNs2 — alternative #7 to safari-mcp
HTTP/2 Apple Push Notification provider for Go - Send push notifications to iOS, tvOS, Safari and OSX apps.
GitHub source3.2kMIT
#8 AIUnknown
go-opus — alternative #8 to safari-mcp
Native Go implementation of the Opus audio codec (RFC 6716) with RFC-compliant decoder.
GitHub source
Questions about this page
How were these alternatives selected?
Each candidate is a live catalogue record in the same primary category, picked by a deterministic score that Oryxen records in its catalogue: how many meaningful words the two listings share, whether their pricing classes oppose (a paid product against a free one), whether both are open source, and whether either record is featured. The same catalogue state always produces the same list — no randomness, no manual ranking.
Are these alternatives ranked by payment?
No. Rows are ordered only by the recorded score, highest first, with alphabetical ties — payment never influences the order, nothing here is paid placement, and Oryxen charges no listing or placement fee.
Always verify current terms with safari-mcp directly — Oryxen records pricing classes, not live quotes.