#1 AIUnknown
engram — alternative #1 to Waggle-mcp
📇 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Local-first persistent memory for AI agents. SQLite + local embeddings (all-MiniLM-L6-v2), hybrid semantic + FTS5 recall, secret...
GitHub source
Recorded alternatives
Alternatives to Waggle-mcp
Every candidate below sits in AI. What ends up on this page is decided entirely by a recorded score — not by bidding, not by editor taste. Review both records, check current vendor terms, then decide.
#2 AIUnknown
vectr — alternative #2 to Waggle-mcp
🐍 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Semantic codebase search + persistent working memory for AI code editors. Hybrid dense + BM25 search over AST-aware chunks, a sy...
GitHub source
#3 AIUnknown
gingugu — alternative #3 to Waggle-mcp
🐍 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Persistent memory for AI coding assistants. Local SQLite, no cloud. 16 MCP tools: store, recall, search, relate, consolidate, ex...
GitHub source
#4 AIUnknown
engram-mcp — alternative #4 to Waggle-mcp
📇 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Persistent semantic memory for AI agents. SQLite-backed, local-first, zero config. Semantic search via Ollama embeddings (nomic-...
GitHub source
#5 AIUnknown
fish-bridge-mcp — alternative #5 to Waggle-mcp
🐍 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Compresses AI chat sessions into a typed knowledge graph (~300–800 tokens). Works file-based in Copilot, Claude Code, Cursor, an...
GitHub source
#6 AIUnknown
memento-mcp — alternative #6 to Waggle-mcp
📇 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Local-first persistent memory for AI coding agents. Captures facts, decisions, patterns, and architecture notes in SQLite (with...
GitHub source
#7 AIUnknown
alaya — alternative #7 to Waggle-mcp
🦀 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Neuroscience-inspired memory engine for AI agents. Stores episodes, consolidates knowledge through a Bjork-strength lifecycle (s...
GitHub source18MIT
#8 AIFree
entroly — alternative #8 to Waggle-mcp
🐍 🦀 🏠 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Auditable context control plane and MCP server for AI coding agents. Compresses context 70–95% (BM25 + entropy + dep-graph kna...
GitHub source
Questions about this page
How were these alternatives selected?
Each candidate is a live catalogue record in the same primary category, picked by a deterministic score that Oryxen records in its catalogue: how many meaningful words the two listings share, whether their pricing classes oppose (a paid product against a free one), whether both are open source, and whether either record is featured. The same catalogue state always produces the same list — no randomness, no manual ranking.
Are these alternatives ranked by payment?
No. Rows are ordered only by the recorded score, highest first, with alphabetical ties — payment never influences the order, nothing here is paid placement, and Oryxen charges no listing or placement fee.
Always verify current terms with Waggle-mcp directly — Oryxen records pricing classes, not live quotes.