#1 AI CodingUnknown
agentty — alternative #1 to devo
⭐ 608 — Native C++26 terminal coding agent and drop-in claude-code alternative; single ~13.6 MB static binary with sub-millisecond cold star...
GitHub source617MIT
Recorded alternatives
Alternatives to devo
Every candidate below sits in AI Coding. What ends up on this page is decided entirely by a recorded score — not by bidding, not by editor taste. Review both records, check current vendor terms, then decide.
#2 AI CodingUnknown
DvalinCode — alternative #2 to devo
⭐ 112 — Provider-neutral, local-first coding agent (Chat/Cowork/Code modes) built for governance: an org policy engine, enforced network egr...
GitHub source
#3 AI CodingPaid
tmuxlet — alternative #3 to devo
⭐ 7 — Rust CLI that runs interactive coding CLIs (Claude, Codex, Gemini, opencode, pi, Cursor) inside tmux and exposes a normalized claude -...
GitHub source
#4 AI CodingUnknown
Ante — alternative #4 to devo
⭐ 1.8k [Antigma Labs] — Single ~15 MB Rust binary terminal coding agent (research preview) with client–daemon architecture, interactive TUI...
GitHub source2kApache-2.0
#5 AI CodingFree
Artalk — alternative #5 to devo
Comment system built in Golang, providing a lightweight and highly customizable solution for adding comments to your website. (Source Code)...
Catalogue source
#6 AI CodingFree
Brackets — alternative #6 to devo
Brackets is an open-source text editor specifically designed for web development. It is lightweight, easy to use, and highly customizable.
Catalogue source
#7 AI CodingUnknown
Agentless — alternative #7 to devo
⭐ 2.1k — Lightweight approach to autonomous software engineering without persistent agent loops.
GitHub source2.1kMIT
#8 AI CodingUnknown
gomarklint — alternative #8 to devo
Markdown linter with built-in HTTP link validation, single binary, no Node.js required.
GitHub source
Questions about this page
How were these alternatives selected?
Each candidate is a live catalogue record in the same primary category, picked by a deterministic score that Oryxen records in its catalogue: how many meaningful words the two listings share, whether their pricing classes oppose (a paid product against a free one), whether both are open source, and whether either record is featured. The same catalogue state always produces the same list — no randomness, no manual ranking.
Are these alternatives ranked by payment?
No. Rows are ordered only by the recorded score, highest first, with alphabetical ties — payment never influences the order, nothing here is paid placement, and Oryxen charges no listing or placement fee.
Always verify current terms with devo directly — Oryxen records pricing classes, not live quotes.